B. Nakashima
To Win
S. Ofner
To Win
Arthur Cazaux vs Brandon Nakashima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L W W L L
Form
W L W W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Cazaux 1 - 1 Nakashima
They have played 6 sets in total, with Cazaux winning 2 and Nakashima winning 4. The last match between Cazaux and Nakashima was at the U.S. Open - New York, 28-08-2024, Second, Hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-4 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Arthur Cazaux | 1 |
| Brandon Nakashima | 1 |
U.S. Open - New York(28-08-2024)
6
4
6
4
6
2
| Cazaux | Stats | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (5-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (12-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 116 | Ranking | 32 |
| 63 | Highest Rank | 31 |
| 22 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 8 |
| 62% (175-109) | Career Total W/L | 61% (238-151) |
| $1,070,755 | Career Prize Money | $3,035,300 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Arthur Cazaux
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
12
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 7-5 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
13
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 26 | Games Won | 31 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:9:24 | Average Match Time | 2:9:24 |
| 55% (98/178) | 1st Serve % | 67% (116/173) |
| 77% (75/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (84/116) |
| 50% (40/80) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (35/57) |
| 27% (3/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
| 31% (54/173) | Return Points Win % | 35% (63/178) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Arthur Cazaux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Arthur Cazaux
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Arthur Cazaux
60%
(
78 of
130)
1st Serve %
52%
(
63 of
121)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
40%
(
52 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
121)
125
Total Points Won
126
|
7-5 6-7(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Constant Lestienne
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Li Tu
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
13
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Arthur Cazaux
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Arthur Cazaux
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
11
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Stan Wawrinka
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Arthur Cazaux
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
9
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
2
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
116
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Sebastian Baez
59%
(
84 of
143)
1st Serve %
75%
(
97 of
129)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
65 of
97)
56%
(
33 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
35%
(
50 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
49 of
129)
142
Total Points Won
130
|
6-3 5-7 3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Arthur Cazaux
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
12
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
79 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
114)
2
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
33 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
David Goffin
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (175/109) | Win/Loss | 61% (238/151) |
| 60% (404/274) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (569/389) |
| 54% (3538/2984) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5025/4409) |
| 69% (104/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (118/76) |
| 51% (40/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (31/30) |
| 55% (22/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (65/29) |
| 56% (9/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (24/16) |
| 0.65 | Aces Per Game | 0.57 |
| 2056 | Aces Total | 2613 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 589 | Total Double Faults | 667 |
| 1:52:5 | Average Match Time | 1:44:53 |
| 355.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 264.3 |
| 58% (11802/20336) | 1st Serve % | 64% (17964/28288) |
| 75% (8854/11802) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (13387/17964) |
| 51% (4358/8534) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (5589/10324) |
| 41% (828/2032) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (939/2479) |
| 39% (8064/20545) | Return Points Win % | 37% (10915/29442) |
| 40% (8/12) | Slam W/L | 49% (19/20) |
| 37% (7/12) | Masters W/L | 48% (27/29) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) |
| 40% (14/21) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (80/56) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (92/45) | Challenger W/L | 70% (92/40) |
| 74% (54/19) | Futures W/L | 74% (17/6) |
| 63% (168/266) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (212/346) |
| 41% (7/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (23/40) |
| 54% (61/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (118/215) |
| 53% (46/87) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (61/122) |
| 86% (180/154) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (240/206) |
| 14% (180/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (240/34) |
| 21% (103/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (148/30) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
